CS 454, Section 001	Sonoma State University	Spring, 2026

Theory of Computation
Instructor: Henry M. Walker Lecturer, Sonoma State University Professor Emeritus of Computer Science and Mathematics, Grinnell College

Although much of this course has been well developed in recent semesters, some details may be adjusted from semester to semester.
In particular, the Signature Project for this course satisfies SSU's Upper Division GE Area B Requirement for CS Majors, but details of this project likely vary from instructor to instructor and from semester to semester.
In particular,

This course syllabus can be expected to remain stable through the semester (except for clarifying statements or for correcting typographical errors, if any).
The course schedule, assignments, elements of the Signature Project, and other course materials may be adjusted as the semester progresses, until the week before student work is due. Be sure to check/reload Web pages for the course before starting required course work.

Assignment on Turing Machines

Turing Machine for 2 a's: Consider an input alphabet Σ = {a, b}, and let L = {strings w over Σ | w contains two consecutive a's}. Design a Turing machine that accepts the language L. Write out your machine in full, both using a complete transition table and using a state diagram.

Consider the input alphabet for this problem to be {a, b}.
Turing Machine for Palindromes: Design a Turing machine that reads a string s and returns the string ss^R, where s^R is the reverse of the string s. For example, given the string "abbaa", the Turing machine should halt after "abbaaaabba" is printed on the tape. As in Problem 1, write out your machine in full, both using a complete transition table and using a state diagram, and consider the input alphabet to be {a, b}.
Derivations of Context Free Grammars in Chomsky Normal Form:
1. Suppose G is a context free grammar in Chomsky Normal Form, and suppose s is a string of length k that is generated by G. Show that the derivation of s will require exactly 2k-1 steps.
2. Give an example to illustrate why a proof of part a by mathematical induction might be extremely difficult, if not impossible.
Proof Summaries: Behind the proof of each theorem lies an idea. The details of a proof may require extensive exposition, but the underlying idea often can be explained in several sentences. For each of the following theorems, write an explanation (in your own words) of why the result is true; what is/are the main idea(s) of the proof.
1. Theorem 3.13
2. Theorem 3.16
Notes:
- Since your proof summaries are to be in your own words, it is not acceptable to copy a proof from the text, just changing a few words now and then. Think about how to reorganize the proof or how to present in at a different level of detail (e.g., explaining the main ideas, but leaving out selected details that simply implement the main ideas).
- Each explanation should be reasonably thorough — 1/2-2/3 page in length for each part.
- Each explanation should include all main ideas of the argument; details may be omitted, but only if they follow naturally from the ideas presented.
- Each explanation should be logically organized and clearly written.

created Fall, 2023 revised Fall, 2023
For more information, please contact Henry M. Walker at walker@cs.grinnell.edu.